<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 474 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177883</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the tax case appeal, upholding the dropping of penalty proceedings by the CIT(A) and confirmed by the Tribunal. The court found that the assessee had cooperated with the authorities, provided relevant information, and had a bona fide belief that the service charges should not be taxed as income from house property. The court referenced the Supreme Court judgment in T. Ashok Pai vs. CIT (2007) in support of its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:33:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 474 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177883</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the tax case appeal, upholding the dropping of penalty proceedings by the CIT(A) and confirmed by the Tribunal. The court found that the assessee had cooperated with the authorities, provided relevant information, and had a bona fide belief that the service charges should not be taxed as income from house property. The court referenced the Supreme Court judgment in T. Ashok Pai vs. CIT (2007) in support of its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>