<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1114 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177853</link>
    <description>An intermediate product is liable to central excise duty only if marketability is established on a fresh factual examination. Sugar syrup generated during manufacture and captively used in the factory required reconsideration on that issue, because earlier similar cases had treated marketability as the decisive question. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh determination of whether the syrup was marketable before any duty demand could be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:07:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1114 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177853</link>
      <description>An intermediate product is liable to central excise duty only if marketability is established on a fresh factual examination. Sugar syrup generated during manufacture and captively used in the factory required reconsideration on that issue, because earlier similar cases had treated marketability as the decisive question. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh determination of whether the syrup was marketable before any duty demand could be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>