https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177856 The appeal against the dropping of demand for excess freight charges forming part of the assessable value of goods was upheld. The Judicial Member relied on Supreme Court decisions and Tribunal rulings, concluding that excess freight charges should not be included unless there is evidence of collecting the value of goods under the guise of freight charges. As there was no such evidence presented in this case, the impugned order was upheld, rejecting the Revenue's appeal based on established legal principles. en-us Fri, 29 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:07:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177856 The appeal against the dropping of demand for excess freight charges forming part of the assessable value of goods was upheld. The Judicial Member relied on Supreme Court decisions and Tribunal rulings, concluding that excess freight charges should not be included unless there is evidence of collecting the value of goods under the guise of freight charges. As there was no such evidence presented in this case, the impugned order was upheld, rejecting the Revenue's appeal based on established legal principles. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177856