<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 756 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues, dismissing the department&#039;s appeals. The expenses for brand building and advertisement were considered revenue in nature, the higher depreciation rate for computer systems was confirmed, and depreciation on sealed premises was allowed under the block of assets system.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:06:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 756 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues, dismissing the department&#039;s appeals. The expenses for brand building and advertisement were considered revenue in nature, the higher depreciation rate for computer systems was confirmed, and depreciation on sealed premises was allowed under the block of assets system.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>