<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 735 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270943</link>
    <description>In a service tax appeal, the Supreme Court condoned the delay and then dismissed the matter without recording any substantive reasons on the dispute. The only operative legal steps reflected in the text are the acceptance of the delayed filing and the final dismissal of the civil appeal. No further legal issue, statutory interpretation, or determination on the service tax controversy is stated in the document.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:03:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 735 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270943</link>
      <description>In a service tax appeal, the Supreme Court condoned the delay and then dismissed the matter without recording any substantive reasons on the dispute. The only operative legal steps reflected in the text are the acceptance of the delayed filing and the final dismissal of the civil appeal. No further legal issue, statutory interpretation, or determination on the service tax controversy is stated in the document.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>