https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270939 The Tribunal ruled that for the period pre-1-7-2000, the appellant was not liable to pay bailing charges, but for the period post-1-7-2000, the charges were to be included in the assessable value. Penalties were not imposed as the appellant demonstrated the charges were for special packing. The demands for the extended period were unsustainable, while demands for the normal period were upheld, with interest payable by the appellant. en-us Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jan 2016 06:59:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270939 The Tribunal ruled that for the period pre-1-7-2000, the appellant was not liable to pay bailing charges, but for the period post-1-7-2000, the charges were to be included in the assessable value. Penalties were not imposed as the appellant demonstrated the charges were for special packing. The demands for the extended period were unsustainable, while demands for the normal period were upheld, with interest payable by the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270939