<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1070 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177851</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the appeal, upholding the findings of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal that cash receipts credited to the sale account were reflected in the assessee&#039;s profit and could not be treated as undisclosed income. The departmental representative failed to challenge the factual findings or advance substantive arguments. Because the determinations were factual, they did not warrant interference and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 15:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1070 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177851</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the appeal, upholding the findings of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal that cash receipts credited to the sale account were reflected in the assessee&#039;s profit and could not be treated as undisclosed income. The departmental representative failed to challenge the factual findings or advance substantive arguments. Because the determinations were factual, they did not warrant interference and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>