<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1918 (11) TMI 1 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177842</link>
    <description>Entries in regularly kept books of account are relevant, but they do not by themselves fasten liability under the Evidence Act. The article states that the plaintiff&#039;s books were found genuine and regularly maintained, and the account entries were supported by vouchers, chits, independent circumstances, and oral testimony on specific transactions. The defendant&#039;s denial was not backed by accounts or convincing rebuttal, and no effective cross-examination challenge was made to the plaintiff&#039;s evidence. On that factual basis, the transactions were treated as real and honest, sufficient corroboration existed beyond the book entries, and the decree in the plaintiff&#039;s favour was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 1918 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:44:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1918 (11) TMI 1 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177842</link>
      <description>Entries in regularly kept books of account are relevant, but they do not by themselves fasten liability under the Evidence Act. The article states that the plaintiff&#039;s books were found genuine and regularly maintained, and the account entries were supported by vouchers, chits, independent circumstances, and oral testimony on specific transactions. The defendant&#039;s denial was not backed by accounts or convincing rebuttal, and no effective cross-examination challenge was made to the plaintiff&#039;s evidence. On that factual basis, the transactions were treated as real and honest, sufficient corroboration existed beyond the book entries, and the decree in the plaintiff&#039;s favour was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 1918 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>