<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 737 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177837</link>
    <description>The tribunal confirmed the validity of the reassessment proceedings under Section 147. It remitted the issue of disallowance of deduction under Section 80IA(4) back to the AO for fresh examination, directing consideration of the entire contract and additional evidence. The tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 4,23,918/- to the gross total income due to lack of substantiation from the assessee. Appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 737 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177837</link>
      <description>The tribunal confirmed the validity of the reassessment proceedings under Section 147. It remitted the issue of disallowance of deduction under Section 80IA(4) back to the AO for fresh examination, directing consideration of the entire contract and additional evidence. The tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 4,23,918/- to the gross total income due to lack of substantiation from the assessee. Appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>