<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 952 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177835</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the matter back to the AO for a fresh examination. The AO was directed to consider the entire contract documents and other relevant evidence. If the assessee could demonstrate its involvement in developing infrastructure facilities, including design, engineering, construction, maintenance, and financial aspects, it would be entitled to the deduction under section 80IA(4). The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2023 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 952 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177835</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the matter back to the AO for a fresh examination. The AO was directed to consider the entire contract documents and other relevant evidence. If the assessee could demonstrate its involvement in developing infrastructure facilities, including design, engineering, construction, maintenance, and financial aspects, it would be entitled to the deduction under section 80IA(4). The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>