<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1239 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177825</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, restoring the matter of interest income on government funds to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication in light of the State Government&#039;s order. The disallowance under Section 14A with Rule 8D was deleted as the Assessing Officer did not record objective satisfaction, contrary to judicial pronouncements, and no expenditure was found to have been incurred for earning exempt income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 10:20:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1239 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177825</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, restoring the matter of interest income on government funds to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication in light of the State Government&#039;s order. The disallowance under Section 14A with Rule 8D was deleted as the Assessing Officer did not record objective satisfaction, contrary to judicial pronouncements, and no expenditure was found to have been incurred for earning exempt income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>