https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270909 The Supreme Court held that the dispute was squarely covered by its earlier decision in Laghu Udyog Bharthi v. Union of India, making the Department's challenge untenable. The Court treated the precedent as binding and found that the minimal tax effect did not justify interference with the existing legal position. On that basis, it found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it. en-us Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270909 The Supreme Court held that the dispute was squarely covered by its earlier decision in Laghu Udyog Bharthi v. Union of India, making the Department's challenge untenable. The Court treated the precedent as binding and found that the minimal tax effect did not justify interference with the existing legal position. On that basis, it found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270909