<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 698 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270906</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the inclusion of freight charges in the assessable value for Central Excise duty. The Tribunal emphasized that excess freight charges should not be automatically added to the assessable value without clear evidence of undervaluation, stating that when goods are delivered ex-factory, the freight element does not impact the product&#039;s valuation unless proven otherwise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 698 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270906</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the inclusion of freight charges in the assessable value for Central Excise duty. The Tribunal emphasized that excess freight charges should not be automatically added to the assessable value without clear evidence of undervaluation, stating that when goods are delivered ex-factory, the freight element does not impact the product&#039;s valuation unless proven otherwise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>