<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 695 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270903</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant had already reversed the amount attributable to inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods. The appellant was directed to pay interest on the reversed amount, with any recoverable interest to be collected. The penalty was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 695 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270903</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant had already reversed the amount attributable to inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods. The appellant was directed to pay interest on the reversed amount, with any recoverable interest to be collected. The penalty was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>