https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270900 The High Court held that the writ petition challenging the confiscation and penalty under the Customs Act was not maintainable after the dismissal of the appeal before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-I). The Court directed the petitioner to seek further relief before CESTAT, as the appeal process had already been initiated. Emphasizing the need for a fair opportunity, the High Court instructed CESTAT to expedite the appeal process and provide a timely resolution within eight weeks. en-us Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jan 2016 21:59:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270900 The High Court held that the writ petition challenging the confiscation and penalty under the Customs Act was not maintainable after the dismissal of the appeal before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-I). The Court directed the petitioner to seek further relief before CESTAT, as the appeal process had already been initiated. Emphasizing the need for a fair opportunity, the High Court instructed CESTAT to expedite the appeal process and provide a timely resolution within eight weeks. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270900