<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 686 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270894</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the refund of duty paid on goods supplied to SEZ Developers treated as export. The tribunal held that the supplies should be considered exports based on established case law, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The appellant&#039;s contention that duty paid should be refunded along with interest was upheld, setting aside the previous order and providing directions for consequential relief in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 21:58:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 686 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270894</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the refund of duty paid on goods supplied to SEZ Developers treated as export. The tribunal held that the supplies should be considered exports based on established case law, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The appellant&#039;s contention that duty paid should be refunded along with interest was upheld, setting aside the previous order and providing directions for consequential relief in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>