<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1601 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177792</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that a remand was necessary as there was no finding on the crucial aspect of marketability, essential for determining the dutiability of sugar syrup. The requirement of pre-deposit was waived, the impugned order set aside, and the matter remanded to the original adjudicating authority. The authority was directed to conduct testing on the sugar syrup and assess its marketability, providing the appellants with a fair opportunity to present their case. No opinion was expressed on the issue, and the original authority was instructed to issue an order in compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:18:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1601 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177792</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that a remand was necessary as there was no finding on the crucial aspect of marketability, essential for determining the dutiability of sugar syrup. The requirement of pre-deposit was waived, the impugned order set aside, and the matter remanded to the original adjudicating authority. The authority was directed to conduct testing on the sugar syrup and assess its marketability, providing the appellants with a fair opportunity to present their case. No opinion was expressed on the issue, and the original authority was instructed to issue an order in compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>