<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 676 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270884</link>
    <description>Retrospective exemption under Notification No. 45/2010-S.T. was examined for services relating to transmission and distribution of electricity, and the claimed distinction from power generation did not establish any error apparent from the record. The record indicated that electricity supply activity could not occur without transmission and distribution, so the earlier order was consistent with the scope of the exemption. On that basis, rectification was not maintainable on merits and the application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 07:09:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 676 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270884</link>
      <description>Retrospective exemption under Notification No. 45/2010-S.T. was examined for services relating to transmission and distribution of electricity, and the claimed distinction from power generation did not establish any error apparent from the record. The record indicated that electricity supply activity could not occur without transmission and distribution, so the earlier order was consistent with the scope of the exemption. On that basis, rectification was not maintainable on merits and the application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>