<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 674 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270882</link>
    <description>The court directed the Appellate Authority to review the penalty issue afresh and pass an appropriate order after hearing the petitioner, within four weeks from the date of receipt of the court&#039;s order. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, allowing for reconsideration of the penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 674 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270882</link>
      <description>The court directed the Appellate Authority to review the penalty issue afresh and pass an appropriate order after hearing the petitioner, within four weeks from the date of receipt of the court&#039;s order. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, allowing for reconsideration of the penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>