<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 671 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270879</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent company. It concluded that the amount claimed by the petitioner was in the nature of a penalty and not an admitted debt, and the petitioner failed to prove actual loss suffered due to the breach of the agreement. Therefore, the respondent company could not be directed to be wound up based on the claimed amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 671 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270879</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent company. It concluded that the amount claimed by the petitioner was in the nature of a penalty and not an admitted debt, and the petitioner failed to prove actual loss suffered due to the breach of the agreement. Therefore, the respondent company could not be directed to be wound up based on the claimed amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>