<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 668 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270876</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax liability and interest payment but set aside penalties under Sections 76 and 70, while upholding the penalty under Section 78. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 668 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270876</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax liability and interest payment but set aside penalties under Sections 76 and 70, while upholding the penalty under Section 78. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>