<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 657 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stressing the necessity of demonstrating commercial expediency and a direct nexus between funds advanced to related entities and interest incurred on borrowings to ascertain the deductibility of interest expenses. The decision highlighted the significance of consistency in interpreting tax laws and applying legal precedents for fair and equitable tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 657 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stressing the necessity of demonstrating commercial expediency and a direct nexus between funds advanced to related entities and interest incurred on borrowings to ascertain the deductibility of interest expenses. The decision highlighted the significance of consistency in interpreting tax laws and applying legal precedents for fair and equitable tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>