<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 134 - HIGH COURT , MP</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1972</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on fuel used in manufacture of PET Chips was admissible because the common-input restrictions under Rule 57C and Rule 57CC did not operate mechanically against fuel, which was treated as outside that restrictive scheme. The assessee was manufacturing PET Chips as its own dutiable final product as well as on job work, and credit could not be denied merely because part of the production was cleared on job work basis. The disallowance of credit was therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 134 - HIGH COURT , MP</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1972</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on fuel used in manufacture of PET Chips was admissible because the common-input restrictions under Rule 57C and Rule 57CC did not operate mechanically against fuel, which was treated as outside that restrictive scheme. The assessee was manufacturing PET Chips as its own dutiable final product as well as on job work, and credit could not be denied merely because part of the production was cleared on job work basis. The disallowance of credit was therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>