<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 653 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270861</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax liability classification under &#039;Commercial and Industrial Construction Services&#039; for construction services provided to telecom service providers. Penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were also upheld, with the appellant directed to pay the reduced penalty amount within 30 days. The penalties were imposed for failure to file returns and failure to register or inform the department of activities, indicating an intention to evade service tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2016 06:37:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 653 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270861</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax liability classification under &#039;Commercial and Industrial Construction Services&#039; for construction services provided to telecom service providers. Penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were also upheld, with the appellant directed to pay the reduced penalty amount within 30 days. The penalties were imposed for failure to file returns and failure to register or inform the department of activities, indicating an intention to evade service tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>