<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 793 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177781</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee. It found that the assessee had proven the genuineness of the transactions, while criticizing the AO for lack of evidence and inadequate opportunity for defense. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletion of additions under section 68 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 793 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177781</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee. It found that the assessee had proven the genuineness of the transactions, while criticizing the AO for lack of evidence and inadequate opportunity for defense. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletion of additions under section 68 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>