https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270858 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority due to insufficient evidence regarding payment of service tax by the main consultant. The appellant's appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with the Stay Order issued by the Commissioner (Appeals). The dispute centered on the liability of the sub-consultant for service tax, with the appellant arguing that the main consultant had already paid the tax. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper examination of documentary evidence, leading to the remand of the matter for further review. en-us Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jan 2016 17:32:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270858 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority due to insufficient evidence regarding payment of service tax by the main consultant. The appellant's appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with the Stay Order issued by the Commissioner (Appeals). The dispute centered on the liability of the sub-consultant for service tax, with the appellant arguing that the main consultant had already paid the tax. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper examination of documentary evidence, leading to the remand of the matter for further review. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270858