<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1013 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177762</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the decision of the ITAT, ruling in favor of the assessee that the expenditure of Rs. 1.45 crores was allowable as revenue expenditure for the assessment year AY 2000-01. The Court found that the expenses were directly related to office operations and business activities, supporting the ITAT&#039;s conclusion. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1013 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177762</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the decision of the ITAT, ruling in favor of the assessee that the expenditure of Rs. 1.45 crores was allowable as revenue expenditure for the assessment year AY 2000-01. The Court found that the expenses were directly related to office operations and business activities, supporting the ITAT&#039;s conclusion. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>