<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 105 -  CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1967</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Department&#039;s appeals, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of the amount collected under the Vimal Millennium Fortune Scheme (VMFS). The Tribunal emphasized that the funds received under the scheme for buying gifts for dealers and distributors should not be considered as additional consideration for Central Excise duty payment. The judgment concluded the matter, affirming that the scheme&#039;s purpose was distinct from assessable value determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 105 -  CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1967</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Department&#039;s appeals, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of the amount collected under the Vimal Millennium Fortune Scheme (VMFS). The Tribunal emphasized that the funds received under the scheme for buying gifts for dealers and distributors should not be considered as additional consideration for Central Excise duty payment. The judgment concluded the matter, affirming that the scheme&#039;s purpose was distinct from assessable value determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>