<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 938 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177756</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed all appeals concerning the assessment years 1998-99 to 2000-01, involving two family members disputing additions for low household withdrawals. The AO had increased declared expenses based on observations during a search operation. However, the ITAT found the AO&#039;s estimations lacked specific evidence of excessive spending and were unjustified. The ITAT directed the deletion of all additions, emphasizing the necessity for concrete evidence to support such adjustments in household expense estimations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 938 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177756</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed all appeals concerning the assessment years 1998-99 to 2000-01, involving two family members disputing additions for low household withdrawals. The AO had increased declared expenses based on observations during a search operation. However, the ITAT found the AO&#039;s estimations lacked specific evidence of excessive spending and were unjustified. The ITAT directed the deletion of all additions, emphasizing the necessity for concrete evidence to support such adjustments in household expense estimations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>