<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 647 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270855</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning disallowance under section 14A, disallowance under section 36(1)(va) towards PF payment, and the treatment of capital expenditure as revenue in nature under section 37. The decisions were based on legal precedents and factual considerations, resulting in a fair and reasoned outcome for each issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 05:56:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 647 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270855</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning disallowance under section 14A, disallowance under section 36(1)(va) towards PF payment, and the treatment of capital expenditure as revenue in nature under section 37. The decisions were based on legal precedents and factual considerations, resulting in a fair and reasoned outcome for each issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>