<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 633 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270841</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleting penalties under sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, ruling that transactions between family members were genuine and bona fide with no tax evasion intent. The judgment emphasized assessing the authenticity and circumstances of transactions before imposing penalties. The order, issued on 28th October 2015, favored the assessees, highlighting the importance of genuine transactions in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 05:54:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 633 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270841</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, deleting penalties under sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act, ruling that transactions between family members were genuine and bona fide with no tax evasion intent. The judgment emphasized assessing the authenticity and circumstances of transactions before imposing penalties. The order, issued on 28th October 2015, favored the assessees, highlighting the importance of genuine transactions in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>