<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 628 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270836</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the appellant mistakenly paid service tax under Manpower Recruitment Agency Services instead of Cargo Handling Services. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision lacked specific findings, and as there was no demand under Cargo Handling Services, the argument for adjustment was rejected. The refund claim was upheld, emphasizing that tax cannot be collected without legal authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 05:53:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 628 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270836</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the appellant mistakenly paid service tax under Manpower Recruitment Agency Services instead of Cargo Handling Services. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision lacked specific findings, and as there was no demand under Cargo Handling Services, the argument for adjustment was rejected. The refund claim was upheld, emphasizing that tax cannot be collected without legal authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>