<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (8) TMI 85 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177735</link>
    <description>A best judgment assessment under section 23(4) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 requires the assessing officer to make a fair estimate honestly and without arbitrariness, vindictiveness or caprice when the assessee defaults in complying with notices and fails to produce evidence. The later determination of the partnership firm&#039;s income at a different figure did not invalidate the assessee&#039;s earlier estimated share income, because the individual assessment and the firm assessment are separate proceedings and subsequent events do not automatically affect a valid estimate made on the date of assessment. Any correction to the partner&#039;s share income had to be sought through the statutory rectification mechanism, and no material showed the estimates to be unsupported or arbitrary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 16:09:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (8) TMI 85 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177735</link>
      <description>A best judgment assessment under section 23(4) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 requires the assessing officer to make a fair estimate honestly and without arbitrariness, vindictiveness or caprice when the assessee defaults in complying with notices and fails to produce evidence. The later determination of the partnership firm&#039;s income at a different figure did not invalidate the assessee&#039;s earlier estimated share income, because the individual assessment and the firm assessment are separate proceedings and subsequent events do not automatically affect a valid estimate made on the date of assessment. Any correction to the partner&#039;s share income had to be sought through the statutory rectification mechanism, and no material showed the estimates to be unsupported or arbitrary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>