<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 631 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177733</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the withdrawal of the claim under section 80IB(10). The judgment emphasized the bonafide nature of the explanation for the withdrawal, the debatable nature of the issue, and the eligibility criteria for claiming the deduction under section 80IB(10) as key factors in determining the validity of the penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 19:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 631 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177733</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the withdrawal of the claim under section 80IB(10). The judgment emphasized the bonafide nature of the explanation for the withdrawal, the debatable nature of the issue, and the eligibility criteria for claiming the deduction under section 80IB(10) as key factors in determining the validity of the penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>