<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 616 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270824</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessment order for the assessment year 2008-09, rejecting challenges regarding the absence of a notice under section 143(2) and non-compliance with CBDT Instruction. The addition of Rs. 5,25,000 towards unexplained cash deposits in the bank account was confirmed, as the explanation provided was deemed unsubstantiated. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed explanations and justifications for cash deposits, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 07:55:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 616 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270824</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessment order for the assessment year 2008-09, rejecting challenges regarding the absence of a notice under section 143(2) and non-compliance with CBDT Instruction. The addition of Rs. 5,25,000 towards unexplained cash deposits in the bank account was confirmed, as the explanation provided was deemed unsubstantiated. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed explanations and justifications for cash deposits, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>