<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 610 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270818</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed all three appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the additions for unexplained cash receipts and unexplained expenditure. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with evidence and upheld the principle that statutory provisions cannot be overridden by mere admissions during search proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 07:55:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 610 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270818</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed all three appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the additions for unexplained cash receipts and unexplained expenditure. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with evidence and upheld the principle that statutory provisions cannot be overridden by mere admissions during search proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>