<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 606 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270814</link>
    <description>The tribunal directed the AO to delete the adhoc addition made on the amount of bogus purchases but upheld the addition based on the difference in GP on undisputed purchases and sales from disputed parties. The appeals of the revenue were dismissed, while the appeals of the assessee were partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 606 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270814</link>
      <description>The tribunal directed the AO to delete the adhoc addition made on the amount of bogus purchases but upheld the addition based on the difference in GP on undisputed purchases and sales from disputed parties. The appeals of the revenue were dismissed, while the appeals of the assessee were partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>