<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 604 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270812</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, deleting the entire disallowance of Rs. 36.68 crores made by the AO, including the suo moto disallowance of Rs. 6.23 crores. The decision was based on the sufficiency of interest-free funds over tax-free investments and legal precedents supporting the assessee&#039;s claims. The Tribunal emphasized that scrutiny assessments should prioritize determining correct taxable income over procedural technicalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 07:55:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 604 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270812</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, deleting the entire disallowance of Rs. 36.68 crores made by the AO, including the suo moto disallowance of Rs. 6.23 crores. The decision was based on the sufficiency of interest-free funds over tax-free investments and legal precedents supporting the assessee&#039;s claims. The Tribunal emphasized that scrutiny assessments should prioritize determining correct taxable income over procedural technicalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>