<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 603 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270811</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and confirming the deletion of the addition of Rs. 16,15,188/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately explained the nature, identity, and genuineness of the transactions, satisfying the requirements of Section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 603 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270811</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and confirming the deletion of the addition of Rs. 16,15,188/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately explained the nature, identity, and genuineness of the transactions, satisfying the requirements of Section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>