<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 599 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270807</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) as the assessee had not concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars. The addition under Section 2(22)(e) was made under a deeming provision, which did not warrant the penalty. The decision was pronounced on 23.10.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 599 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270807</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) as the assessee had not concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars. The addition under Section 2(22)(e) was made under a deeming provision, which did not warrant the penalty. The decision was pronounced on 23.10.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>