<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 743 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177696</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of interest payable on license fee under section 35ABB of the IT Act, 1961. It emphasized the distinction between royalty fee and license fee, clarifying that license fee is for operating telecommunication services while royalty fee is for radio frequency usage. The Court also affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation regarding the distinction between royalty payable to the Wireless Planning and Co-ordination (WPC) and the license fee, stating that the license fee does not include royalty fee to the WPC Wing. Additionally, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the payment made to the Registrar of Companies for share capital increase, based on legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:52:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 743 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177696</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of interest payable on license fee under section 35ABB of the IT Act, 1961. It emphasized the distinction between royalty fee and license fee, clarifying that license fee is for operating telecommunication services while royalty fee is for radio frequency usage. The Court also affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation regarding the distinction between royalty payable to the Wireless Planning and Co-ordination (WPC) and the license fee, stating that the license fee does not include royalty fee to the WPC Wing. Additionally, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the payment made to the Registrar of Companies for share capital increase, based on legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>