<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 556 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270764</link>
    <description>Waste and rejected packaging material arising during biscuit manufacture was treated as scrap, with no separate manufacturing activity found in relation to it. On that basis, the material did not amount to manufacture for excise purposes, so the duty demand could not be sustained. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 556 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270764</link>
      <description>Waste and rejected packaging material arising during biscuit manufacture was treated as scrap, with no separate manufacturing activity found in relation to it. On that basis, the material did not amount to manufacture for excise purposes, so the duty demand could not be sustained. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>