<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 554 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the technical fees were not includable in the transaction value. The decision was based on precedents such as Essar Gujart Ltd. and Denso Kirloskar Industries Pvt. Ltd., with particular emphasis on the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling supporting the exclusion of technical fees post-importation. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and maintained consistency with previous judgments, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:12:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 554 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the technical fees were not includable in the transaction value. The decision was based on precedents such as Essar Gujart Ltd. and Denso Kirloskar Industries Pvt. Ltd., with particular emphasis on the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling supporting the exclusion of technical fees post-importation. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and maintained consistency with previous judgments, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>