<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 548 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270756</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitions seeking approval of composite Schemes, stating they were not maintainable. The judgment emphasized the necessity of filing separate petitions for clarity and proper examination of each scheme&#039;s details. It highlighted the importance of strict compliance with statutory procedures, accurate financial data presentation, and the Company Court&#039;s supervisory role in ensuring proper scheme implementation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 548 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270756</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitions seeking approval of composite Schemes, stating they were not maintainable. The judgment emphasized the necessity of filing separate petitions for clarity and proper examination of each scheme&#039;s details. It highlighted the importance of strict compliance with statutory procedures, accurate financial data presentation, and the Company Court&#039;s supervisory role in ensuring proper scheme implementation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>