<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1096 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177668</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted the addition of Rs. 50,000 as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee was not a shareholder of the lending company. The ITAT held that deemed dividend can only be assessed in the hands of a person who is a shareholder of the lending company, clarifying the application of the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:05:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1096 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177668</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted the addition of Rs. 50,000 as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee was not a shareholder of the lending company. The ITAT held that deemed dividend can only be assessed in the hands of a person who is a shareholder of the lending company, clarifying the application of the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>