https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177661 Section 3 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 was upheld as valid because the exemption power was treated as controlled and guided by the Act's policy, not as excessive delegation. The exemption notification dated 24 September 1974 was read to protect eviction suits instituted during the five-year exemption period, allowing civil courts to decree and execute those suits even after expiry of that period. The classification between old and newly constructed buildings was also upheld as based on an intelligible differentia with a rational nexus to the object of encouraging new construction and increasing accommodation. en-us Tue, 02 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:51:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177661 Section 3 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 was upheld as valid because the exemption power was treated as controlled and guided by the Act's policy, not as excessive delegation. The exemption notification dated 24 September 1974 was read to protect eviction suits instituted during the five-year exemption period, allowing civil courts to decree and execute those suits even after expiry of that period. The classification between old and newly constructed buildings was also upheld as based on an intelligible differentia with a rational nexus to the object of encouraging new construction and increasing accommodation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=177661