<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 97 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1932</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the appellant&#039;s activities primarily involved the sale of goods, not services, leading to the conclusion that no Service Tax was payable. The Order-in-Original was set aside, and the penalties imposed were rejected. The appellant&#039;s genuine belief that they were not liable for Service Tax was considered, resulting in the dismissal of penalties and the absence of Service Tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 97 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1932</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the appellant&#039;s activities primarily involved the sale of goods, not services, leading to the conclusion that no Service Tax was payable. The Order-in-Original was set aside, and the penalties imposed were rejected. The appellant&#039;s genuine belief that they were not liable for Service Tax was considered, resulting in the dismissal of penalties and the absence of Service Tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>