<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 542 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270750</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the assessment order of the AO and the ITAT decision, restoring the CIT (A) order in favor of the Assessee. The Court ruled that the disallowance of expenses lacked legal merit and allowed the appeal in favor of the Assessee against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:53:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 542 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270750</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the assessment order of the AO and the ITAT decision, restoring the CIT (A) order in favor of the Assessee. The Court ruled that the disallowance of expenses lacked legal merit and allowed the appeal in favor of the Assessee against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>