<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 529 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270737</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO concerning the variance between income disclosed during a survey under section 133A and the income declared in the return for A.Y. 2010-11. The ITAT emphasized the need to consider statutory deductions and liabilities in income assessment, highlighting that the statement obtained during the survey was an estimate and not definitive proof of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:53:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 529 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270737</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO concerning the variance between income disclosed during a survey under section 133A and the income declared in the return for A.Y. 2010-11. The ITAT emphasized the need to consider statutory deductions and liabilities in income assessment, highlighting that the statement obtained during the survey was an estimate and not definitive proof of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>