<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 527 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270735</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 3.90 lacs as undisclosed income. Despite doubts raised by the Assessing Officer and ld CIT(A) regarding the genuineness of the gift transaction, the tribunal found sufficient documentary evidence and explanations provided by the assessee to support the authenticity of the gift, leading to the deletion of the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:52:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=413061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 527 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270735</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 3.90 lacs as undisclosed income. Despite doubts raised by the Assessing Officer and ld CIT(A) regarding the genuineness of the gift transaction, the tribunal found sufficient documentary evidence and explanations provided by the assessee to support the authenticity of the gift, leading to the deletion of the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>